Kevin Lawton asked a question last week that's been rattling around the industry: Is warehouse automation's reputation in danger?

He's seeing failed projects pile up. Wrong solutions getting implemented. Companies pulling the plug after expensive mistakes. And he's right to be concerned - these aren't isolated incidents anymore.

But I don't think this is about vendors or operators being bad at their jobs. The real issue is the setup.

We've built an industry narrative that warehouse automation is plug-and-play, infinitely flexible, limitlessly scalable. Operators approach it as a capital project. Vendors show ROI, operators sign off, everyone expects it to work like buying a conveyor. But warehouse robotics isn't capex. It's like WMS or safety systems - it requires ongoing internal expertise, commitment, and organizational muscle.

We also conflate two separate issues. Bad vendor execution (poor implementation, weak support) is one problem - that's a shitty vendor. Bad automation fit (wrong solution for your operation) is a different problem entirely. But both get lumped together as "automation failure" and neither addresses the deeper question: Are you organizationally ready?

Look at who succeeds at scale. Amazon and Walmart made automation a C-suite strategic priority backed by real capability investment. They built internal skillsets and treated it as capability building, not capital deployment.

Until automation stops being treated as a capital project and starts being treated as a strategic capability, we'll keep seeing failures regardless of vendor or solution.

Which brings me to MODEX.

In a few weeks, Atlanta will be packed with operators walking miles of booths, watching robots glide across polished concrete, listening to clean ROI slides, and imagining what their warehouse could look like. Three months later, many of them will still be sitting on a stack of brochures.

Most operators go to MODEX to learn what's possible. But that's the wrong goal. You don't go to discover - you go to validate. The operators who struggle after these shows aren't the ones who saw the wrong demos, they're the ones who saw too many without knowing what their organization could actually absorb.

Before you get on the plane, answer these:

I've seen teams treat this like procurement and it works fine during commissioning. The friction shows up months later. The WMS strains under load. Ownership gets blurry when alarms fire. Executive sponsorship fades once the ribbon is cut.

I've also seen teams underestimate ownership. A system that needed six people during pilot quietly grew to 15 after full deployment. Not because the robots were bad, but because exception handling, monitoring, slotting adjustments, and integration upkeep all needed humans. That staffing model was never in the ROI slide.

On the show floor, everything will run perfectly - controlled environment, best operator, clean workflows. Your warehouse has volatility, peak surges, uneven skill levels, and legacy systems held together by people who know which button not to press.

Questions to ask on the show floor:

The strongest partners probe readiness. They ask about your WMS, your team structure, your change management approach. If a vendor only talks features and never asks about your operational reality, that's a red flag.

After the show - before you call vendors back:

Call your own team first. Get IT, Operations, and Finance in a room and answer:

The robot price is the beginning, not the total. I've seen integration costs surprise teams not because anyone was dishonest, but because integration is real work and no one likes to model the messy parts.

MODEX will show you what's possible. But possible and ready are not the same thing. Vendors will show you their best day. Before you walk into that hall, be clear on yours - especially your worst one.

If you're heading to Atlanta this year, I'm happy to compare notes. It's my backyard.

-Parth

Thoughts? Questions? Feedback? Reply to this email.